One of the best established empirical results in international economics is that bi-lateral trade decreases with distance. Although well-known, this result has not been systematically analyzed before. We examine 1467 distance effects estimated in 103 pa-pers. Information collected on each estimate allows us to test hypotheses about the causes of variation in the estimates. Our most interesting finding is that the estimated negative impact of distance on trade rose around the middle of the century and has remained persistently high since then. This result holds even after controlling for many important differences in samples and methods. JEL classification: F10, C10
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong ...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong...
The ‘distance effect' measuring the elasticity of trade flows to distance has been found to be risin...
One of the best-established empirical results in international economics is that bilateral trade dec...
Buch et al. (2004) explain the “distance puzzle” suggesting that the distance coefficient only measu...
Over the time the effect of distance has became an essential component for understanding internation...
The negative effect of distance on bilateral trade is one of the most robust findings in internation...
The empirical trade literature has long been puzzled by the finding of large and non-decreasing dist...
Trade costs remain an important barrier to international trade in today’s globalizing economy. Despi...
It has been widely argued that, with the decline in trade costs, the importance of distance has decl...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong ...
In his article ‘death of distance’, Caincross (1997) challenged the orthodoxy with regard to the rol...
Distance is of great influence when deciding whom to trade with. This thesis examines how the import...
The measured effect of national borders on trade seems too large to be explained by the apparently s...
The “distance effect” measuring the elasticity of trade flows to distance has been to be rising sinc...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong ...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong...
The ‘distance effect' measuring the elasticity of trade flows to distance has been found to be risin...
One of the best-established empirical results in international economics is that bilateral trade dec...
Buch et al. (2004) explain the “distance puzzle” suggesting that the distance coefficient only measu...
Over the time the effect of distance has became an essential component for understanding internation...
The negative effect of distance on bilateral trade is one of the most robust findings in internation...
The empirical trade literature has long been puzzled by the finding of large and non-decreasing dist...
Trade costs remain an important barrier to international trade in today’s globalizing economy. Despi...
It has been widely argued that, with the decline in trade costs, the importance of distance has decl...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong ...
In his article ‘death of distance’, Caincross (1997) challenged the orthodoxy with regard to the rol...
Distance is of great influence when deciding whom to trade with. This thesis examines how the import...
The measured effect of national borders on trade seems too large to be explained by the apparently s...
The “distance effect” measuring the elasticity of trade flows to distance has been to be rising sinc...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong ...
One of the most famous and robust findings in international economics is that distance has a strong...
The ‘distance effect' measuring the elasticity of trade flows to distance has been found to be risin...